When the pandemic effectively demolished live music in mid-March of last year, the AFM Canadian Office immediately dispatched letters to whomever in government was in a position to be of assistance, as identified with the aid of our knowledgeable lobbyist, Isabel Metcalfe. While Iâm sure our plea to recognize the severity of the situation did not fall upon deaf ears, I can only imagine how many similar documents were received from a variety of sectors. How, then, to stand out in the crowd?
It was only a day or two later that I received a communication from IATSE International Vice President and Director of Canadian Affairs John Lewis, as well as Arden Ryshpan, executive director at Canadian Actors Equity Association (CAEA). The plan was to form a coalition to brainstorm and lobby government, framed within these strange circumstances. Added soon after was Ken MacKenzie, president of the Associated Designers of Canada (ADC). A decision was made to keep the coalition small and nimble, yet the combination now represented 50,000 membersâa significant enough number to attract attention. Our noble group was dubbed the Creative Industries Coalition, and almost immediately had an effect.
We began gathering data on just how many performers and crews were idle, as government loves to have arithmetic for backup evidence. It was not difficult to demonstrate the level of despair in our members, as the cancelled contracts quickly tallied into the millions of dollars. In support of the submissions, Zoom calls were arranged with Minister of Canadian Heritage Steven Guilbeault and Minister of Employment, Workforce Development, and Disability Inclusion Carla Qualtrough, among others. Similar virtual meetings took place with folks like Simon Brault, chair of the Canadian Conference of the Arts.
Results were favourable and speedy, as the government soon announced the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB), designed specifically for the self-employed and others who would normally not qualify for relief under the federal Employment Insurance programme. Two thousand dollars per month was made available to those who applied. However, a glitch soon emerged, whereby one of the criteria was that any ancillary income would result in the claim being disallowed. Now, for musicians (and other performers) who may have had random cheques arrive for royalties and New Use, or were teaching a few students, this was devastating. The coalition organized another round of calls, explained the issue, and was successful in having the requirement amended.
As the spring came to an end, it became apparent that COVID was going nowhere, and, in fact, was worsening, thus necessitating some additional meetings for a CERB extension, which was successful. By then, the government had sufficient time to temporarily restructure the Employment Insurance to include the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB), along with some additional tweaks, which made that universal programme available to the self-employed. The timeline was limited, however, with expiration in early summer.
Sometimes nothing is simple, and so was the case when the government suddenly imposed new criteriaâthat the $5,000 earning threshold was net, not gross. This would have had a debilitating effect on musicians, since expenses are often high as well as tax-deductible. The bottom line: Many performers from all disciplines would have had to pay back the subsidy. Once again, our coalition made submissions and arranged meetings to object to that decision, especially since that condition had not been specified in the rules. This time we were joined by our friends at The Alliance of Canadian Cinema, Television and Radio Artists (ACTRA), as their membership was critically affected as well.
As I write this, an announcement is being made by Carla Qualtrough which reverses the government restriction, due to their error in not being clear about gross versus net. Those who received the subsidy will not be required to pay any back, providing the other qualifications are met.
So what is my point in rehashing all this? By maintaining solidarity with the other performersâ unions, we became stronger together and the difficult situation for performers was acknowledged and addressed relatively quickly. While our coalition may have not been the only voice, we have heard from insiders that ours was both the most respected and effective behind being granted the necessary support in a timely manner.
As musicians, solidarity is even more important within our own union. As we have proven time and again with both government and employers, one voice is simply ignored, while many voices command attention. Now more than ever, value your AFM membership; it brings strength through unity, and itâs the right thing to do.
Petits amis hauts placĂ©s â comment la solidaritĂ© syndicale et les pressions ont contribuĂ© Ă obtenir du soutien politique pour les musiciens canadiens
par Alan Willaert, vice-président de la FAM pour le Canada
Lorsque la pandĂ©mie a terrassĂ© le marchĂ© de la musique vivante Ă la mi-mars lâannĂ©e derniĂšre, le Bureau canadien de la FAM a immĂ©diatement fait parvenir des lettres Ă toutes les personnes au gouvernement qui Ă©taient en position de nous aider â notre bien informĂ©e reprĂ©sentante, Isabel Metcalfe, nous a Ă©tĂ© dâune aide prĂ©cieuse Ă cet Ă©gard. Bien que nos appels Ă reconnaĂźtre la gravitĂ© de la situation ne soient sĂ»rement pas tombĂ©s dans des oreilles de sourds, je ne peux quâimaginer combien de documents similaires ont Ă©tĂ© envoyĂ©s aux mĂȘmes personnes par toute une variĂ©tĂ© de secteurs. Comment, donc, pouvions-nous ressortir du lot ?
Ce nâest quâun jour ou deux plus tard que jâai reçu une communication du vice-prĂ©sident international et directeur des affaires canadiennes de lâIATSE, John Lewis, de mĂȘme que dâArden Ryshpan, directrice exĂ©cutive de la Canadian Actors Equity Association. Le plan consistait Ă former une coalition pour brasser des idĂ©es et exercer des pressions auprĂšs du gouvernement dans le cadre de ces Ă©tranges circonstances. Peu aprĂšs sâest ajoutĂ© Ken MacKenzie, prĂ©sident de lâAssociation des dĂ©signers canadiens. Nous avons pris la dĂ©cision de nous en tenir lĂ afin que la coalition reste agile, dâailleurs nous reprĂ©sentions dĂ©jĂ quelque 50 000 membres, certainement un assez grand nombre pour attirer lâattention. Notre noble groupe, que nous avons appelĂ© la Coalition des industries crĂ©atives, a eu un effet presque immĂ©diat.
Nous avons commencĂ© Ă recueillir des donnĂ©es quant au nombre dâartistes et dâĂ©quipes techniques qui Ă©taient sans travail, car le gouvernement aime beaucoup justifier ses intervention avec des chiffres. Il nâa pas Ă©tĂ© difficile de dĂ©montrer la dĂ©tresse de nos membres puisque les contrats annulĂ©s que nous avons retracĂ©s ont vite atteint les millions de dollars. En complĂ©ment de nos soumissions au gouvernement, il y a eu des appels sur Zoom avec Steven Guilbeault, ministre du Patrimoine canadien, et Carla Qualtrough, ministre de lâEmploi, du DĂ©veloppement de la main-dâĆuvre et de lâInclusion des personnes handicapĂ©es, entre autres. Des rencontres virtuelles similaires ont Ă©galement eu lieu avec Simon Brault, prĂ©sident de la ConfĂ©rence canadienne des arts.
Nous avons rapidement obtenu des rĂ©sultats positifs, le gouvernement annonçant peu aprĂšs la mise en Ćuvre de la Prestation canadienne dâurgence (PCU), conçue spĂ©cifiquement pour les travailleurs autonomes et les autres qui ne sont pas normalement admissibles au programme fĂ©dĂ©ral dâassurance-emploi. On donnait deux mille dollars par mois Ă ceux qui en faisaient la demande. Toutefois, un problĂšme sâest prĂ©sentĂ©, car selon un des critĂšres du programme, tout revenu dâappoint entraĂźnait le refus de la demande. Pour les musiciens et les autres artistes de la scĂšne qui reçoivent de temps Ă autre des paiements de droits dâauteur, pour de nouvelles utilisations ou qui font un peu dâenseignement, câĂ©tait catastrophique. La coalition a organisĂ© une nouvelle ronde dâappels pour expliquer lâenjeu et a rĂ©ussi Ă faire modifier ce critĂšre.
Ă la fin du printemps, il est devenu clair que la COVID nâallait pas disparaĂźtre de sitĂŽt, elle sâaggravait mĂȘme, dâoĂč la nĂ©cessitĂ© de rĂ©unions supplĂ©mentaires pour obtenir le prolongement de la PCU, qui a Ă©tĂ© accordĂ©. Rendu lĂ , le gouvernement avait eu le temps de restructurer lâassurance-emploi de façon temporaire pour y inclure la Prestation canadienne de la reprise Ă©conomique (PCRE) et faire quelques autres ajustements qui permettraient aux travailleurs autonomes dâavoir accĂšs Ă ce programme universel. Toutefois, ces dispositions devaient prendre fin au dĂ©but de lâĂ©tĂ©.
Les choses ne sont pas toujours simples, comme lorsque le gouvernement a soudainement imposĂ© de nouveaux critĂšres, notamment en prĂ©cisant que le seuil de revenu de 5000 $ devait ĂȘtre net et non brut. CâeĂ»t Ă©tĂ© dĂ©bilitant pour les musiciens, parce que leurs dĂ©penses sont souvent Ă©levĂ©es et dĂ©ductibles de lâimpĂŽt. En bout de ligne, beaucoup dâartistes de la scĂšne de toutes les disciplines auraient eu Ă rembourser leurs prestations. Encore une fois, notre coalition a fait des reprĂ©sentations et organisĂ© des rencontres afin de sâopposer Ă cette dĂ©cision, surtout que ladite condition ne figurait pas dans les rĂšgles dâadmissibilitĂ©. Cette fois, nos amis de lâAlliance des artistes canadiens du cinĂ©ma, de la tĂ©lĂ©vision et de la radio, mieux connus comme lâACTRA, se sont joints Ă nous, car leurs membres auraient Ă©tĂ© gravement affectĂ©s eux aussi.
Au moment dâĂ©crire ces lignes, Carla Qualtrough annonce le retrait de cette restriction en reconnaissance du manque de clartĂ© des rĂšgles dâorigine Ă ce sujet. Ceux qui ont reçu la PCU ou la PCRE nâauront pas Ă la rembourser en autant quâils rĂ©pondent aux autres critĂšres dâadmissibilitĂ©.
Pourquoi est-ce que je rappelle tout ça ? Pour illustrer que lorsque nous sommes solidaires entre syndicats dâartistes, nous sommes plus forts. Notre situation difficile commune a Ă©tĂ© reconnue et traitĂ©e plutĂŽt rapidement. Notre coalition nâa peut-ĂȘtre pas Ă©tĂ© la seule voix Ă se faire entendre, mais dâaprĂšs les commentaires que nous avons reçus dâacteurs au sein de lâappareil gouvernemental, la nĂŽtre Ă©tait Ă la fois la plus respectĂ©e et la plus effective pour obtenir en temps opportun le soutien dont nous avions besoin.
Comme musiciens, la solidaritĂ© est encore plus importante au sein de notre propre syndicat. Comme nous lâavons dĂ©montrĂ© encore et encore, avec le gouvernement et avec les employeurs, on ignore facilement une voix unique tandis que plusieurs voix retiennent lâattention. Maintenant plus que jamais, apprĂ©ciez la valeur de votre adhĂ©sion Ă la FAM; elle est source de force de par lâunitĂ© quâelle reprĂ©sente. Rester membre, câest la chose Ă faire.