Hip-Hop’s Billion-Dollar Beat Deserves Union Protection

July 1, 2025

IM  -  

Hip-hop has long been a global economic force. Hip-hop and R&B accounted for over 25% of all US streams in 2024. According to the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), in 2022, hip-hop generated $15.9 billion from music streams and purchases alone. Yet, behind the impressive streaming numbers and sold-out tours lies a harsh reality: most hip-hop musicians are vulnerable to exploitation, financial instability, and lack of workplace protections.

According to data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics and Canada’s Cultural Human Resources Council, there are conservatively over 44,000 hip-hop and R&B musicians working across North America. However, this number is likely a significant undercount. Due to the somewhat informal nature of the music business—particularly with independent musicians—many hip-hop artists may not report their music income through traditional channels.

Union participation remains alarmingly low. Fewer than 12% of these musicians are unionized—a percentage far below other genres, especially classical, where unionization is the norm. This gap leads to one conclusion. Hip-hop musicians need to be part of our union.

While superstar artists like Drake, Cardi B, or Kendrick Lamar earn millions, they represent a tiny fraction of the field. Most hip-hop artists earn under $30,000 annually, after expenses, struggling to sustain themselves in an industry where streaming—an over $46 billion global industry—pays them mere fractions of a cent per stream.

Independent artists find it nearly impossible to break even, let alone build a career. The rise of so-called “360 deals”—where labels take a cut of an artist’s earnings from all income streams (touring, merch, endorsements, etc.)—has made matters worse. Artists like Lupe Fiasco and Chamillionaire have been vocal critics of these exploitative arrangements.

The major centers of hip-hop—Atlanta, Los Angeles, New York, and Toronto—are also hotspots for labor abuses. These cities have become ground zero for both artistic innovation and systemic exploitation. Attempts to organize hip-hop musicians have emerged over the years. The AFM and SAG-AFTRA have made outreach efforts, though progress is slow.

Some locals are leading the way. Local 10-208 (Chicago, IL), for instance, recently launched organizing drives in the hip-hop space. This model should be expanded across the Federation. Notably, some hip-hop figures are already part of the union family. Questlove, a member of Local 802 (New York City), is a longtime advocate for the fair treatment of musicians.

Union campaigns—such as the historic wins in motion picture and television scoring and the recent ratification of the Live TV Agreement with new grievance and arbitration provisions—prove that organizing can deliver real, tangible gains. If extended to the hip-hop community, such efforts could mean better streaming royalty rates, legal protections from predatory contracts, and vital financial literacy education for artists.

Critics sometimes claim unionization stifles an artist’s independence and creative spirit. But history demonstrates otherwise. Musicians working in theater, recording sessions, and classical music have all benefitted from collective bargaining without sacrificing their artistry. The freedom to create and the right to fair compensation are not mutually exclusive.

Ultimately, hip-hop’s cultural and economic success is built on the backs of thousands of underpaid and unprotected musicians. The AFM could be the structural support this community desperately needs—a safeguard for its artists, and a pathway toward long-term sustainability in an industry that too often chews up and spits out its talent.

---